ArticleFrontiers in radiology2025
Artificial intelligence-assisted accurate diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears using customized CNN and YOLOv9.
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AI in Hand and Wrist Radiography: Multimodal Large Language Models for Distal Radius Fracture Detection and Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is critical for timely treatment planning. Deep learning (DL) approaches have shown promise in assisting clinicians, but many prior studies are limited by small datasets, lack of surgical confirmation, or exclusion of partial tears. Aim: To evaluate the performance of multiple convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures, including a proposed CustomCNN, for ACL tear detection using a surgically validated dataset. Methods: A total of 8,086 proton density-weighted sagittal knee MRI slices were obtained from patients whose ACL status (intact, partial, or complete tear) was confirmed arthroscopically. Eleven deep learning models, including CustomCNN, DenseNet121, and InceptionResNetV2, were trained and evaluated with strict patient-level separation to avoid data leakage. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The CustomCNN model achieved the highest diagnostic performance, with an accuracy of 91.5% (95% CI: 89.5-93.1), sensitivity of 92.4% (95% CI: 90.4-94.2), and an AUC of 0.913. The inclusion of both partial and complete tears enhanced clinical relevance, and patient-level splitting reduced the risk of inflated metrics from correlated slices. Compared with previous reports, the proposed approach demonstrated competitive results while addressing key methodological limitations. Conclusion: The CustomCNN model enables rapid and reliable detection of ACL tears, including partial lesions, and may serve as a valuable decision-support tool for radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. The use of a surgically validated dataset and rigorous methodology enhances clinical credibility. Future work should expand to multicenter datasets, diverse MRI protocols, and prospective reader studies to establish generalizability and facilitate integration into real-world workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.