Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262479›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2025

Effect of chemical post-processing on the compressive strength of MSLA 3D printed orthodontic models: an in vitro comparative study.

Neha Choudhary, Deepankar Bhatnagar, Swapna Sreenivasagan, Komal Yadav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neha ChoudharyDepartment of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Maharshi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Deepankar BhatnagarDepartment of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Maharshi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.
Swapna SreenivasaganDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, India.
Komal YadavDepartment of Orthodontics Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MM College of Dental Sciences & Research, Maharshi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D) printing, particularly Masked Stereolithography (MSLA), has emerged as a transformative technology in orthodontics for the fabrication of precise dental models. However, the mechanical integrity of these models, especially compressive strength, is critical during procedures such as thermoforming of clear aligners. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different chemical post-processing methods on the compressive strength of MSLA-printed dental models. Materials and method: A total of 40 cylindrical resin samples (10 mm in height and 5 mm in diameter) were fabricated using an MSLA printer and divided into four groups ( Results: The compressive strength varied with statistical significance among the groups ( Conclusion: In conclusion, chemical post-processing significantly influences the compressive strength of MSLA-printed models. Acetone had a deleterious impact on compressive strength. Isopropyl alcohol proved to be an acceptable solvent. Propylene glycol showed large variability in results, warranting further investigation.

Indexed as

compressive strengthMSLA 3D printingorthodontic modelspost-processingpropylene glycol

Identifiers

PMID41262479
PMCPMC12624280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.