ArticleCogent mental health2023
Inventory of interpersonal problems-32 (IIP-32): Psychometric properties in adolescents from Argentina.
Article in Cogent mental health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic Factors Related to Interpersonal Dysfunction in Acromegaly: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study in China.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) is a widely studied instrument in the mental health field. While there have been some applications of this tool in adolescents, the majority of research has focused on the adult population. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32 (IIP-32) specifically in Argentinian adolescents. A total of 557 participants completed the IIP-32 alongside an additional assessment of interpersonal traits. To evaluate reliability, we analyzed internal consistency and item homogeneity. We analyzed the construct validity of IIP-32 through confirmatory factor analysis and the concurrent validity through correlations between the IIP-32 and other measures of interpersonal traits. The findings of this study indicate adequate internal consistency and homogeneity of the items, as well as construct, concurrent and criterion validity. Overall, the results of this paper establish the IIP-32 as a reliable and valid instrument with significant clinical implications for assessing interpersonal difficulties in adolescents from Argentina.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.