ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Exploratory Study of Cesarean Scar Healing After Interrupted Versus Continuous Sutures: Prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment in Cynomolgus Monkeys.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploratory Study of Cesarean Scar Healing After Interrupted Versus Continuous Sutures: Prospective Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment in Cynomolgus Monkeys.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the effects of double-layer interrupted sutures (DIS) and double-layer continuous sutures (DCS) on uterine blood flow and residual myometrial thickness (RMT) in cynomolgus monkeys after cesarean section (CS). Methods: In DIS ( Results: At 6 months, Ktrans was significantly higher in the DIS group 6. RMT at the suture site did not differ significantly between groups. Adhesions were observed in three DIS and two DCS animals. Nonadhesive DIS animals had significantly higher Ktrans and greater RMT at 6 months compared with adhesive DIS animals. Nonadhesive DIS exhibited significantly higher Ktrans and greater RMT at 6 months than nonadhesive DCS. Conclusion: While overall differences were limited, exploratory findings indicate that DIS demonstrated superior uterine blood flow compared with DCS. Nonadhesive DIS animals exhibited greater RMT than adhesive DIS animals, suggesting a potential benefit of adhesion prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.