ArticleEquity neuroscience2025
Sex and gender differences in Lewy body dementia: a narrative review.
Article in Equity neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Con-sequins 2026: From mission to momentum.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- Metabolism Pathway Blood Proteomic Differences in Lewy Body Dementia Compared to Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Sex differences for symptoms prior to dementia onset in people with Lewy body pathology compared to pure Alzheimer's disease pathology.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Lewy body dementia (LBD), including Parkinson's disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies, is one of the most prevalent and burdensome type of dementias. Clinical diagnostic accuracy during life remains limited and there are currently only symptomatic therapy options without disease modification. However, recent advances in biomarkers and clinical trials are promising. Literature so far showed sex and gender differences in older adults without cognitive changes, people with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. While the number of studies in LBD are lower, understanding sex and gender differences and the underlying reasons can improve both diagnosis and treatment for LBD. Accordingly, the aim of this narrative review is to provide a summary of the literature for sex and gender differences in LBD. Majority of the studies for LBD investigating sex/gender differences so far focused on sex, with sex and gender terms being misused at times. Experiences of people in non-binary categories for sex or gender have yet to be investigated. While more research is needed, findings so far outline sex differences in prevalence, risk factors, biomarkers, symptoms, progression, treatment, daily life, and pathology for LBD. Sex-specific risk factors have also been reported, emphasizing the value of sex-stratified analyses and investigating female/male-specific factors such as sex hormones, menopause, and sex chromosomes. Lack of adequate research representation for females and women, as well as people from non-binary categories, is an important limitation that should be addressed to obtain more applicable findings in LBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.