ArticleNMC case report journal2025
Sterile Inflammatory Response Mimicking Infection after DuraGen Duraplasty: A Case Report.
Article in NMC case report journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurosurgery as an immune anchor point: a translational framework for perioperative immunoengineering.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Eosinophil-rich sterile fluid collection after calcium phosphate cement use in cranial reconstruction: A case suggesting implant-associated inflammatory reaction.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DuraGen, a collagen matrix-based artificial dura mater, is widely used in neurosurgery because of its biocompatibility and ease of use. Although generally considered safe, we present a rare case of a foreign body reaction to DuraGen presenting as a sterile inflammatory response. A 40-year-old woman underwent total resection of a right convexity meningioma, with dural repair using DuraGen. On postoperative day 31, she developed headache, nausea, and vomiting. Imaging revealed significant cerebral edema around the surgical cavity with midline shift but no signs of infection on diffusion-weighted imaging. To rule out infection, reoperation was performed. Intraoperatively, there was no purulence or necrosis, but DuraGen was found adherent to the cortical surface. The artificial dura was removed and replaced with Gore-Tex. Microbiological cultures were negative. Histopathology showed inflammatory granulation tissue with eosinophilic infiltration, indicating a foreign body reaction. The patient's symptoms resolved immediately after surgery, and follow-up imaging at 5 months confirmed complete radiological resolution. This case highlights a rare but significant complication of DuraGen, demonstrating that foreign body reactions can mimic infectious processes and lead to severe cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension. Awareness of this potential complication is important for neurosurgeons, especially when infection is suspected but not clearly supported by imaging or intraoperative findings. Timely recognition and removal of the offending material can lead to rapid clinical and radiological improvement. This case underscores the importance of considering foreign body reaction in the differential diagnosis of delayed deterioration after duraplasty, particularly when infection is not definitively confirmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.