Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262218›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2025

Internal Neurolysis for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia without Vascular Compression: Report of 2 Cases.

Sigeomi Yokoya, Takuro Inoue, Yukihiro Goto

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sigeomi YokoyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Saiseikai Shiga Hospital, Imperial Gift Foundation Inc., Ritto, Shiga, Japan.
Takuro InoueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Koto Memorial Hospital, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan.
Yukihiro GotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Koto Memorial Hospital, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internal neurolysis has been shown to be effective in treating trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression. However, its use in glossopharyngeal neuralgia has been rarely reported, with only a single previous case described in the literature, despite the similarities in the underlying mechanisms of neurovascular compression. This study reports 2 cases of glossopharyngeal neuralgia without vascular compression that were successfully treated with internal neurolysis. Patient 1, a 57-year-old woman with 32 months of untreated episodic pain, underwent microvascular decompression, but no vascular compression was identified. Internal neurolysis was performed, generating immediate pain relief and resolution of transient dysphagia and hoarseness within days. The patient remained pain-free at 18-month follow-up. Patient 2, a 65-year-old man with recurrent pain after prior microvascular decompression and gamma knife radiosurgery, underwent a second microvascular decompression, which failed to resolve his symptoms. Internal neurolysis was performed 21 months later, leading to sustained pain relief and no recurrence at 12-month follow-up. These cases suggest that internal neurolysis is a feasible and potentially effective treatment for glossopharyngeal neuralgia without vascular compression. However, the procedure presents technical challenges due to the fragile and mobile nature of the glossopharyngeal nerve, necessitating meticulous handling and precise dissection to avoid nerve injury. Further studies are required to evaluate its long-term efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

glossopharyngeal neuralgiainternal neurolysismicrovascular decompressiontrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID41262218
PMCPMC12623137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.