Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025

A qualitative exploratory study of teachers' perceptions of movement behavior of students with intellectual disabilities in the school context.

Tim Messerschmidt, Nadja Schott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim MesserschmidtDepartment for Sport Psychology and Human Movement Science, Institute of Sport and Movement Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Nadja SchottDepartment for Sport Psychology and Human Movement Science, Institute of Sport and Movement Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored teachers' perceptions of movement behavior of students with intellectual disabilities (ID), intending to support the development of adapted motor assessment instruments and interventions. Methods: The study involved sixteen teachers from German schools for children and adolescents with ID, each of whom worked as a teacher with a specific focus and background and was similarly involved in the school's daily routine. A semi-structured interview focusing on six central research questions was conducted with each teacher who participated. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative text analysis with the help of MAXQDA. Results: Six main thematic codes were generated within the analysis. Teachers' perceptions revealed that students show different levels of motor development and that most demonstrate potential for motor learning. As ascertained by the teachers, students can generally be considered a remarkably heterogeneous population, encompassing individuals with diverse diagnoses, needs, and motor and cognitive abilities. The teachers also reported that the students are generally able to perform simple everyday activities and are keen to learn or perform activities that help them become more independent and self-determined. They also mentioned that they have difficulties performing fine and gross motor activities. A range of individual, task-related, and environmental factors influences movement behavior and desires as well as problems related to movement behavior. Moreover, various sports and movement activities, as well as different forms of therapy, are offered at German special schools for students with ID. In the context of teaching practices, the teachers underlined the importance of using an individualized and gradual methodological approach to promote students' movement behavior. Discussion and conclusions: The findings suggest that both motor interventions and assessments should be adapted to the specific needs or characteristics of children and adolescents with ID so that they can participate and perform. Moreover, motor assessments and interventions should be systematically structured to address the specific needs of children and adolescents with ID, and to optimize the progress in motor learning. Within physical training, practitioners should place value on improving activities that are important for increasing independence and mastering everyday life, as well as for the overall personal development of the individual with ID. Attractive and promising tasks as well as assistive technology may be regarded as appropriate means to promote movement behavior. Future research should include the views of students and their families and other exploration techniques, e.g., direct observation or group interviews, to expand the understanding of movement behavior.

Indexed as

developmental disordersenvironmental constraintsgentile taxonomy of motor skillsindividualmotor skillsNewells's constraint modelqualitative interviewtask

Identifiers

PMID41262175
PMCPMC12623388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.