ArticleACS ES&T water2025
Sediment-Water Interfaces as Traps and Sources of Microplastic Fragments and MicrofibersInsights from Stream Flume Experiments.
Article in ACS ES&T water, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastic pollution has been found to negatively impact water quality and ecosystem health in numerous riverine environments at different spatial and temporal scales. However, many of the underlying principles controlling microplastic transport and retention mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we study the deposition behavior of nylon fibers and fragments (small and large) in flow-controlled stream flume experiments with gravel or mixed sediment. We use a stochastic modeling approach and Latin hypercube sampling to optimize the parameters describing microplastic deposition and resuspension and relate deposition rates to settling rates calculated using Stoke's law. Our experiments show that lower streamflow velocity leads to faster microplastic deposition, an effect that is shape-dependent and more pronounced for fibers. In experiments with similar flow velocity, large fragments were more quickly deposited in flumes containing gravel compared to mixed sediment. Stoke's settling rates and model-based deposition rates can differ by several orders of magnitude, especially for fibers. For our flume experiments, these differences are attributed to transitional and turbulent flow near the streambed. Results emphasize that microplastic net deposition and near-bed transport cannot be well described by Stoke's law. Results will further our understanding of microplastic fate and transport in riverine environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.