Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262134›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of occupational therapy2025

The value of the occupational therapy workforce in primary care: A rapid review.

Caroline Coomber, Genevieve Smyth, Elizabeth Taylor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caroline CoomberRoyal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3757-8156
Genevieve SmythRoyal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK.
Elizabeth TaylorRoyal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4596-823X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Primary care is a growing area for allied health professionals, including occupational therapists, offering opportunities for early intervention and prevention alongside collaborative, holistic approaches to patient care. The aim of the rapid review was to explore the evidence regarding positioning occupational therapists in this setting. Methods: Bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Medline, APA PsycInfo), Google Scholar and websites of relevant organisations were searched. Search parameters were English language and date (2013-2024). The initial inclusion criteria focussed on United Kingdom (UK) research but due to a lack of high-quality evidence, randomised controlled trials from countries outside of the UK were included. Findings: Sixteen papers were included in the review. Four papers reported UK research. Interventions included falls prevention, frailty services, lifestyle management programmes, medication adherence, mindfulness and vocational clinics. Conclusion: The evidence supported the positioning of the occupational therapy workforce in primary care particularly in the areas of falls interventions, frailty services and self-management. Where occupational therapists were co-located with primary care professionals, this fostered communication, information sharing and a better understanding of occupational therapy.

Indexed as

general practicegeneral practitionersOccupational therapyprimary carerapid review

Identifiers

PMID41262134
PMCPMC12623633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.