ReviewThe British journal of occupational therapy2025
The value of the occupational therapy workforce in primary care: A rapid review.
Review in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Primary care is a growing area for allied health professionals, including occupational therapists, offering opportunities for early intervention and prevention alongside collaborative, holistic approaches to patient care. The aim of the rapid review was to explore the evidence regarding positioning occupational therapists in this setting. Methods: Bibliographic databases (CINAHL, Medline, APA PsycInfo), Google Scholar and websites of relevant organisations were searched. Search parameters were English language and date (2013-2024). The initial inclusion criteria focussed on United Kingdom (UK) research but due to a lack of high-quality evidence, randomised controlled trials from countries outside of the UK were included. Findings: Sixteen papers were included in the review. Four papers reported UK research. Interventions included falls prevention, frailty services, lifestyle management programmes, medication adherence, mindfulness and vocational clinics. Conclusion: The evidence supported the positioning of the occupational therapy workforce in primary care particularly in the areas of falls interventions, frailty services and self-management. Where occupational therapists were co-located with primary care professionals, this fostered communication, information sharing and a better understanding of occupational therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.