ArticleThe British journal of occupational therapy2025
An action research project about how to improve the support by primary school teachers of children who are delayed in their readiness to write.
Article in The British journal of occupational therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Handwriting difficulties are relatively common, and negatively impact children's emotional well-being and academic performance. This study aims to understand what one cohort of early career primary school teachers (ECTs) know about handwriting readiness from their training, and how to help teachers better support children who are delayed in their readiness to write. Method: Phase 1 of the study utilised a purposive sampling strategy to send an online survey to all ECTs in Kent, UK. Phase 2 consisted of a handwriting training session and focus group with six ECTs. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyse data from both phases. Results: In total, 82% of respondents reported no training in handwriting development and 90% were not taught how to identify children with handwriting difficulties. Themes from focus group data included a lack of confidence in teaching handwriting, uncertainty about how to support children with handwriting difficulties, and a need to understand handwriting prerequisites. Conclusion: Findings demonstrate a gap in teachers' knowledge of handwriting instruction and lack of confidence with handwriting and identifying handwriting difficulties. Findings suggest there is huge potential for further research in this area, both to benefit children and young people and to build workforce skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.