ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy
Hysteroscopy: The Uterine Stethoscope Decoding Implantation Failures.
Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To offer or not to offer hysteroscopy has remained an important question among clinicians treating infertility. With this question, we studied the impact of hysteroscopic diagnosis and treatment of pathologies in terms of improvement in implantation rates in patients requiring Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 432 infertile patients who underwent hysteroscopy prior to embryo transfer (ET) between January 2016 and December 2023: Group 1: patients with previous IVF failure and Group 2: patients without previous IVF failure. Chi-square test of independence was used to check if the relationship found in the contingency table is significant or not as 5% level of significance. Results: A significant number of participants in Group 1 and Group 2, 70.5% ( Conclusion: Although Cochrane review suggests a low level of evidence to support screening hysteroscopy prior to IVF, the results of our study direct us to offer hysteroscopy, preferably to all women planned for IVF-ET cycle irrespective of the ultrasound findings and especially to the patients who have experienced IVF Failure in previous cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.