ArticleHealth science reports2025
Demographic Patterns and Clinical Presentations of Demodicosis in a Longitudinal Study From Khuzestan Province, Southwest Iran.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demographic Patterns and Clinical Presentations of Demodicosis in a Longitudinal Study From Khuzestan Province, Southwest Iran.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Demodicosis is a significant dermatological condition caused by Methods: A total of 382 patients with confirmed demodicosis were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected from records of Iran Zamin Medical Diagnostic Laboratory (2002-2024). Demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, co-infections, and atypical manifestations were documented. Skin scrapings were examined microscopically to confirm Results: The mean patient age was 36.6 ± 12.8 years, with a marked female predominance (77.7%). The age distribution showed that the 21-35 age group accounted for the largest proportion of cases (45.3%), while pediatric (≤ 20 years) and geriatric (> 65 years) groups showed no significant gender disparity. Co-infections were identified in 6.8% of cases, predominantly involving dermatophyte infections, such as Conclusion: This is the first large-scale study of demodicosis in the general population of Iran, covering a 22-year period. It is also among the first worldwide to explore co-infections systematically. The findings emphasize significant demographic and clinical patterns, particularly age- and gender-specific susceptibility and the complex interplay of co-infections. These insights expand the understanding of demodicosis and highlight the importance of considering its atypical manifestations and associated infections in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.