ArticleHealth science reports2025
Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty and Influencing Factors; Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medico-legal patterns of cosmetic malpractice: a comparative analysis of complaints and judicial outcomes between licensed and unlicensed providers in Shiraz, Iran.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction With Rhinoplasty and Influencing Factors; Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran.Health science reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The present study aimed to investigate patients' satisfaction after rhinoplasty using the ROE questionnaire and to examine some influencing variables. Methods: This is an analytical cross-sectional study. The study population included all patients seeking rhinoplasty referred to the plastic surgery department of Velayat Hospital in Rasht in 2023. Initially, the demographic characteristics of the patients were recorded. The Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction. All patients were operated on by a single experienced plastic and reconstructive surgeon using the open rhinoplasty technique. The ROE questionnaire was completed by all patients before surgery and then 3 months after surgery during a follow-up visit. Descriptive and analytic statistics were used for data analysis, with a significance level of Results: One hundred and thirty patients were examined. Eighty-five of the participants (65.4%) were female. The mean age of the patients undergoing rhinoplasty was 26.5 ± 6.24 years. The obtained score before rhinoplasty in patients was 32.76 ± 12.63, and 3 months after surgery, it was 92.05 ± 5.83, which was statistically significant ( Conclusion: This study showed that despite the complexity and intricacies of rhinoplasty, it leads to high satisfaction levels for most patients, and some demographic factors significantly affect patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty outcomes. However, generally, rhinoplasty has a positive effect on patient satisfaction regardless of age, gender, and education level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.