Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261894›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2025

Estimating Abundance of Crop-Foraging Primates in Anthropogenic Landscapes Using Camera Traps.

Jamie E T McKaughan, Philip A Stephens, Russell A Hill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jamie E T McKaughanDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3077-8337
Philip A StephensConservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Russell A HillDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.

Funding

This study was supported by Earthwatch Institute.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human populations grow, competition with wildlife increases, driving more frequent and intense negative interactions between humans and wildlife, of which crop foraging by primates like baboons (Papio spp.) is a notable example. Farmers struggle to coexist with baboons, and are particularly concerned by their abundance, with more baboons resulting in more damage. Despite extensive primate research, there are few population estimates, particularly for chacma baboons (Papio ursinus). Estimating baboon densities could inform conservation policies, including strategies to mitigate crop losses and negative human-baboon interactions. Conventional techniques for estimating density are impractical for baboons in commercial farmland or have been unsuccessful in the past, but camera trapping could provide an alternative. Through field tests of the distance sampling with camera traps (CTDS) and the random encounter model (REM) methods, we compare estimates of chacma baboon densities, assessing the potential of these methods for monitoring species that move in large and stable social groups. Chacma baboon density was 1-3 individuals/km

Indexed as

Papio ursinusAgricultureAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesCrops, AgriculturalPopulation Densitychacma babooncommercial farmlandPapio ursinusREMSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41261894
PMCPMC12631099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.