Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261822›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025

Principles to promote social equality across the cancer trajectory: A group concept mapping study.

Maria Aagesen, Eva E Wæhrens, Pernille Bidstrup, Gunn Ammitzbøll, Hanne Tønnesen, Eva Kjeldsted, Susanne O Dalton, Karen La Cour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria AagesenOccupational Science, User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. maagesen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-3692
Eva E WæhrensOccupational Science, User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospitals Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-1659
Pernille BidstrupPsychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-6800
Gunn AmmitzbøllDanish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS), Naestved, Denmark; Cancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-9475
Hanne TønnesenWHO-CC, Clinical Health Promotion Centre, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-3416
Eva KjeldstedDanish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS), Naestved, Denmark; Cancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-8102
Susanne O DaltonDanish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS), Naestved, Denmark; Cancer Survivorship, Danish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5485-2730
Karen La CourOccupational Science, User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7126-0318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSocial inequality is a growing problem throughout the cancer trajectory. Since 2019, the Danish Research Center for Equality in Cancer (COMPAS) has therefore, through seven work packages developed and tested various methodologies, approaches, and interventions to promote social equality in cancer from diagnosis to end of life. This study aimed to synthesize the knowledge generated across the work packages to provide guiding principles for promoting social equity across the cancer trajectory. MATERIAL AND

methodsA group concept mapping study was conducted in Denmark between February and June 2023. Twenty-two employees from all COMPAS work packages brainstormed ideas on how to promote social equality across the cancer trajectory. Fourteen participants subsequently sorted and rated the ideas by importance. Multidimensional scaling analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis were used to generate a cluster rating map outlining principles for promoting social equality in cancer. These principles were validated by 10 participants during an in-person validation meeting. Discussions from both the brainstorming and validation meeting were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed.

resultsEight principles comprising 162 ideas were identified. Four principles focused on the patient-provider level: (1) Person-centred approach, (2) Supportive interventions targeting vulnerable patients, (3) Communication, and (4) Screening for vulnerability. Four addressed the organizational and policy level: (5) Skills development and implementation, (6) Coherence across, (7) Organizational and cultural factors, and (8) Transportation and accessibility.

interpretationIntegrating these principles into future research and clinical practice may support efforts to reduce social inequities across the cancer trajectory.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID41261822
PMCPMC12645219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.