ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Provider, Interdisciplinary Staff, and Patient Perspectives on the Potential for Cognitive Assessment and Care Plan Services in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Documented follow-up to memory concerns reported at the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn 2017, Medicare introduced the cognitive assessment and care plan (CACP) billing code to incentivize comprehensive care for people living with dementia (PLWD). CACP requires addressing 8 care domains. Adoption of CACP has been limited, particularly in primary care. We identified barriers and facilitators of implementing CACP in primary care.
methodsPrimary care providers (PCP), interdisciplinary staff, and PLWD and/or caregivers from primary care practices participated in semi-structured interviews about dementia care. We applied content analysis methods to analyze qualitative data mapped to 3 CACP implementation outcomes: acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.
resultMost participants found CACP acceptable due to its comprehensive nature and addressing unmet needs. PCPs and staff felt CACP was appropriate for primary care because they were already addressing many of the required care domains during Medicare Annual Wellness Visits (AWV). Concerns about the time, resources, and coordination needed made feasibility unclear. Potential strategies for implementation included using interdisciplinary team members, data and workflows from AWV implementation, and health information technology.
conclusionsCACP is acceptable and appropriate for primary care though comprehensiveness and requirements limit feasibility. Implementation strategies must address time, resource, coordination, and awareness/education needs to successfully deliver this Medicare benefit at a large scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.