Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261733›Full record

SynthesisPediatric pulmonology2025

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review of Emerging Phase 3 Evidence.

Almutairi Ghadah, Alharbi Aryam, Almutairi Shahad, Alansari Hatun, Aljadani Amani, Bohulaigah Zinab, Alholais Anoud, Alfadhel Abdulmajeed, Abusido Tamer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Update on Pediatric asthma management: Recent advances.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Almutairi GhadahQassim College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Alharbi AryamKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0003-0619-3237
Almutairi ShahadKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Alansari HatunKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Aljadani AmaniKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Bohulaigah ZinabCollege of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alholais AnoudCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Alfadhel AbdulmajeedKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abusido TamerKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-3959

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor. There is a paucity of evidence regarding its efficacy and safety in pediatrics. Pediatric-specific data are limited, and most evidence comes from recent phase 3 trials and post hoc analyses.

objectiveTo summarize the current evidence of the efficacy, safety, and biomarker effects of dupilumab in children with moderate-to-severe asthma, while identifying key gaps in the pediatric evidence base.

methodsThis study is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, and aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and biomarker response of dupilumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe asthma. We evaluated the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0.

resultsSix studies from 2021 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria: three of them are phase 3 randomized controlled trials and the other three post hoc analyses, mostly including children aged 6-11 years with type 2 inflammation, defined by elevated blood eosinophils and/or FeNO. Both allergic and nonallergic asthma phenotypes were represented across studies, with post hoc analyses indicating consistent benefit in each group. Dupilumab decreased the rate of severe exacerbations annually by 59.3% in children with type 2 inflammation. The study populations are mainly children between 6 and 11 years of age with moderate-to-severe asthma, characterized by eosinophilic or allergic phenotypes (type 2 asthma), including those with elevated blood eosinophils and/or FeNO levels. Dupilumab reduced the annual rate of severe exacerbation by ~59%, with greater reductions in children with FeNO ≥50 ppb (69%) or eosinophils ≥300 cells/µL (65%). The lung function showed improvement by 0.15-0.30 L in pre-bronchodilator FEV₁, accompanied by gains in asthma control and quality of life. Biomarker reductions (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE, TARC) were consistent across phenotypes. Adverse event rates were like placebo; eosinophilia and injection site reactions were more common but usually mild.

conclusionThis systematic review provides an early synthesis of emerging pediatric phase 3 evidence on dupilumab. While results suggest substantial benefits in reducing exacerbations, improving lung function, and modulating type 2 biomarkers, the evidence remains limited to short-term studies in a narrow age range. Longer-term follow-up, broader age representation, and real-world data are needed to define the long-term role of dupilumab in pediatric asthma. Prospero Code: CRD42024557750.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaBiomarkersChildClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersdupilumabasthmabiomarkerschildren with type 2 inflammationdupilumabexacerbationsmonoclonal antibodypediatricsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41261733
PMCPMC12630998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.