SynthesisPediatric pulmonology2025
Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review of Emerging Phase 3 Evidence.
Synthesis in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Children With Moderate-to-Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review of Emerging Phase 3 Evidence.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Pooled it
- Update on Pediatric asthma management: Recent advances.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026Review
- The JAK-STAT pathway in allergic diseases: from pathogenesis to targeted therapy.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDupilumab is a human monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor. There is a paucity of evidence regarding its efficacy and safety in pediatrics. Pediatric-specific data are limited, and most evidence comes from recent phase 3 trials and post hoc analyses.
objectiveTo summarize the current evidence of the efficacy, safety, and biomarker effects of dupilumab in children with moderate-to-severe asthma, while identifying key gaps in the pediatric evidence base.
methodsThis study is a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, and aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and biomarker response of dupilumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe asthma. We evaluated the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0.
resultsSix studies from 2021 to 2024 met the inclusion criteria: three of them are phase 3 randomized controlled trials and the other three post hoc analyses, mostly including children aged 6-11 years with type 2 inflammation, defined by elevated blood eosinophils and/or FeNO. Both allergic and nonallergic asthma phenotypes were represented across studies, with post hoc analyses indicating consistent benefit in each group. Dupilumab decreased the rate of severe exacerbations annually by 59.3% in children with type 2 inflammation. The study populations are mainly children between 6 and 11 years of age with moderate-to-severe asthma, characterized by eosinophilic or allergic phenotypes (type 2 asthma), including those with elevated blood eosinophils and/or FeNO levels. Dupilumab reduced the annual rate of severe exacerbation by ~59%, with greater reductions in children with FeNO ≥50 ppb (69%) or eosinophils ≥300 cells/µL (65%). The lung function showed improvement by 0.15-0.30 L in pre-bronchodilator FEV₁, accompanied by gains in asthma control and quality of life. Biomarker reductions (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE, TARC) were consistent across phenotypes. Adverse event rates were like placebo; eosinophilia and injection site reactions were more common but usually mild.
conclusionThis systematic review provides an early synthesis of emerging pediatric phase 3 evidence on dupilumab. While results suggest substantial benefits in reducing exacerbations, improving lung function, and modulating type 2 biomarkers, the evidence remains limited to short-term studies in a narrow age range. Longer-term follow-up, broader age representation, and real-world data are needed to define the long-term role of dupilumab in pediatric asthma. Prospero Code: CRD42024557750.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.