ReviewJournal of perinatal medicine2026
Integrating mental health into obstetric practice: a review of collaborative care models for perinatal anxiety.
Review in Journal of perinatal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New perspectives from evidence to action - patient-centered evidence transformation in evidence-based nursing: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePerinatal anxiety is one of the most common yet least systematically addressed complications of preg- nancy and childbirth. Despite abundant evidence that collaborative and integrated care models improve maternal outcomes, obstetric practice still lacks a defined operational standard for addressing anxiety alongside routine obstetric care. Fragmented screening, insufficient referral systems, and financing barriers continue to delay intervention, widening inequities across populations and settings.
methodsThis opinion article synthesizes recent evidence (2010-2025) from PubMed, Google Scholar, and professional guidelines to propose a practical framework for embedding mental health care within obstetric workflows. Drawing upon studies from high- and low-resource contexts, we outline a ten-point minimum standard for perinatal-anxiety management and a three-tier maturity model that describes the progressive integration of collaborative care-from basic screening to digitally supported, team-based systems. The model identifies measurable implementation metrics and policy levers that enable sustainability and equity.
resultsRather than advocating new research, this article translates two decades of findings into a clinically actionable standard. It emphasizes the central role of ob- stetric teams in early detection, stepped care, and follow-up through coordination with mental-health professionals.
conclusionsIntegrating mental health into obstetric practice is both a moral and operational imperative. By adopting the proposed minimum standard and maturity model, health systems can transform perinatal anxiety care from discre- tionary innovation to routine expectation-achieving faster response, broader access, and better maternal-infant out- comes worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41261445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.