ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Antimicrobial stewardship interventions in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region Countries: a scoping review of clinical, economic, and consumption outcomes.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antibiotic Consumption, Bacterial Susceptibility, and Costs in a High-Complexity Public Hospital.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Burden and Economic Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance inThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions are designed to optimize antimicrobial use, reduce adverse effects, and address antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In WHO Eastern Mediterranean Office (EMRO) countries, these efforts are important due to high antibiotic use, evolving resistance patterns, and developing regulatory frameworks.
objectivesThis scoping review evaluates ASP interventions in EMRO countries by systematically mapping their strategies, clinical, economic, and consumption outcomes, as well as identifying their barriers/limitations to effective implementation.
methodsThis scoping review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic literature search was performed without a time limitation to the end of December 2024 across four major databases-PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus-to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies. The search was limited to English-language publications originating from EMRO countries. Eligible studies were required to evaluate ASP interventions and report comparative pre- and post-intervention outcomes. Eligible studies involved healthcare workers or patients. A qualitative color intensity classification system was applied within a thematic matrix to visually represent the relative impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Intensity levels (Dark, Medium, Light) reflected the clinical and managerial relevance of outcomes across economic, clinical, and adherence-related domains.
resultsA total of 77 studies with 199 interventions from 11 EMRO countries were included, with the majority originating from Saudi Arabia (n = 50, 25.12%), the United Arab Emirates (n = 33, 16.58%), and Iran (n = 28, 14.07%). Audit and feedback were the most frequent interventions (n = 50, 25.12%), followed by restrictive, educational, and protocol-driven strategies (each n = 26, 13.06%). Most interventions targeted adults (n = 52, 26.13%) and were implemented in hospital settings (n = 160, 82.05%), primarily at the tertiary level of care. High-impact outcomes-mainly for audit and feedback-included reduced antibiotic use, AMR, and costs. Common limitations were single-center design (n = 40, 18.26%) and poor documentation (n = 33, 15.06%).
conclusionsASP interventions in the EMRO region show varying effectiveness, with audit and feedback proving most successful. Regional cooperation and continued efforts are essential to overcome challenges and strengthen these programs. Future efforts should focus on standardized implementation, improved reporting, and further research to effectively scale successful ASP strategies across the EMRO region. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first scoping review of ASP interventions in EMRO countries summarizing their strategies, outcomes, and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.