Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261361›Full record

ReviewObstetrics & gynecology science2026

Outcome of pregnancy after adenomyomectomy: a review.

Ha Lim Shin, Young Mi Jung, Hyeon Ji Kim, Jee Yoon Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ha Lim ShinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Young Mi JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyeon Ji KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Jee Yoon ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenomyosis, a prevalent yet frequently underdiagnosed uterine disorder, poses significant challenges for women of reproductive age, especially those seeking fertility. Although hysterectomy remains the definitive treatment, fertility-sparing interventions such as adenomyomectomy have gained traction despite ongoing debates regarding their efficacy and safety. This review synthesizes the current evidence on reproductive and perinatal outcomes following adenomyomectomy, evaluates its risks and benefits and provides evidence-based clinical recommendations. We reviewed the diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis, with a particular focus on fertility-sparing surgery, and summarized the pregnancy outcomes and obstetric risks after adenomyomectomy, including recommendations for prenatal care. Adenomyomectomy may improve fertility in carefully selected patients; however, it carries substantial obstetric risks including placenta accreta spectrum, preterm birth, and life-threatening hemorrhage. While it offers a viable alternative to hysterectomy, its use should be restricted to women with severe symptoms or those who have failed assisted reproductive technology cycles and should be managed within a framework of shared decision-making and high-risk obstetric care. Future research should address diagnostic standardization, long-term reproductive outcomes, and strategies to mitigate surgical complications.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisFertility preservationMyomectomyPregnancy outcomeUterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID41261361
PMCPMC12862148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.