ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
The Long-Term Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Lower Facial Rejuvenation in 400 Patients.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment to: "Comparison of Same Versus Different Projection Implants in Asymmetric Tuberous Breasts: Long-Term Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Analysis".Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBotulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has become an established treatment for upper facial rejuvenation; however, its use in the lower face and neck is less explored and presents anatomical challenges. This study evaluates the long-term efficacy and safety of BoNT-A injections for lower facial rejuvenation, emphasizing potential cumulative effects and muscle modulation.
methodsA retrospective single-centre analysis was conducted on 400 patients (380 females and 20 males; aged 35-85 years) treated between January 2018 and December 2024. Patients received, during a full face treatment, BoNT-A injections targeting the mentalis, depressor anguli oris, platysmal bands, and masseter muscles, with standardized doses ranging from 120 to 160 units per session every 6 months. Patients underwent a minimum of three sessions over a follow-up period of 24-60 months. Outcomes were assessed using the Merz Aesthetic Scale (for platysmal bands) and a 5-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) based on standardized pre-treatments photographic and video documentation reviewed by two independent plastic surgeons.
resultsThe mean Merz score reported these results baseline (pre-first treatment): 4.2 ± 0.6, after first cycle: 2.1 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01), and after third cycle: 1.8 ± 0.3 (p < 0.001 compared to baseline). Independent VAS ratings confirmed significant improvements in contour and soft tissue balance Global improvement score: pre-treatment 1.5 ± 0.7 → post-treatment 4.1 ± 0.4 (p < 0.001). Notably, patients maintained results longer than the expected pharmacological effect window, supporting the hypothesis of functional muscle retraining. Mild adverse events occurred in less than 12% of patients, mainly localized bruising and discomfort, with no serious complications.
conclusionsIn this large cohort of 400 patients, BoNT-A injections for lower facial rejuvenation produced significant aesthetic improvements with progressive and sustained benefits over time. The concept of cumulative neuromodulation offers new insight into long-term lower face aesthetic management. Our results support BoNT-A as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment option in expert hands. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors 43 assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full 44 description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, 45 please refer to the Table of Contents or the online 46 Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41261253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.