Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261247›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Development of a simulation-based laparoscopic ventral rectopexy module: skills training for minimally invasive pelvic surgery.

Hernán Zuñiga, Cristian Jarry, Roberto Salas, Eduardo Machuca, José Tomás Larach, María Elena Molina, Julián Varas

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hernán ZuñigaExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, 2ndFloor, Región Metropolitana, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian JarryExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, 2ndFloor, Región Metropolitana, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
Roberto SalasColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo MachucaExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, 2ndFloor, Región Metropolitana, 8330024, Santiago, Chile.
José Tomás LarachColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
María Elena MolinaColorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. memolina@uc.cl.
Julián VarasExperimental Surgery and Simulation Center, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Digestive Surgery, UC-Christus Health Network, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Marcoleta 377, 2ndFloor, Región Metropolitana, 8330024, Santiago, Chile. jevaras@uc.cl.ORCID 0000-0002-5828-9623

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic pelvic surgery presents significant technical challenges due to anatomical constraints such as limited working space and proximity to neurovascular structures. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) was selected as the procedural framework for model design and validation, given its complexity and relevance as a representative pelvic procedure. This study aimed to develop and validate a synthetic and reproducible simulation model with structural and functional fidelity to support the acquisition of laparoscopic skills in anatomically restricted pelvic environments.

methodsA synthetic pelvic model was developed through iterative prototyping, integrating 3D-printed bone structures and platinum-cured silicone. Face validity and user reaction were initially assessed by eleven surgeons with varying expertise. Construct validity was then evaluated through performance in a simulated LVMR, using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a Procedure-Specific Rating Scale (SRS). Surgical time was recorded by procedural steps. Data were analyzed using non-parametric methods.

resultsExperts achieved significantly higher OSATS scores (median 20.5 [20.38-21]) than non-experts (16 [14.75-17.25]; p = 0.01), and higher SRS scores (16.25 [16-16.88] vs. 13.5 [13.25-15]; p = 0.009). Step-specific advantages were observed in surgical flow (p = 0.025) and knot tying (p = 0.018). Although global operative time was shorter in experts (29.3 vs. 52.8 min), it was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). Most participants described the model as realistic, useful, and representative of actual surgical conditions.

conclusionThis validated, reusable model provides strong educational value for advanced laparoscopic pelvic training and structured skill acquisition.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceLaparoscopyModels, AnatomicRectumSimulation TrainingFemaleHumansOperative TimePrinting, Three-DimensionalSurgical MeshColorectal cancerColorectal surgeryMinimally invasive surgerySimulation trainingSurgical education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.