ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Development of a simulation-based laparoscopic ventral rectopexy module: skills training for minimally invasive pelvic surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic pelvic surgery presents significant technical challenges due to anatomical constraints such as limited working space and proximity to neurovascular structures. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) was selected as the procedural framework for model design and validation, given its complexity and relevance as a representative pelvic procedure. This study aimed to develop and validate a synthetic and reproducible simulation model with structural and functional fidelity to support the acquisition of laparoscopic skills in anatomically restricted pelvic environments.
methodsA synthetic pelvic model was developed through iterative prototyping, integrating 3D-printed bone structures and platinum-cured silicone. Face validity and user reaction were initially assessed by eleven surgeons with varying expertise. Construct validity was then evaluated through performance in a simulated LVMR, using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and a Procedure-Specific Rating Scale (SRS). Surgical time was recorded by procedural steps. Data were analyzed using non-parametric methods.
resultsExperts achieved significantly higher OSATS scores (median 20.5 [20.38-21]) than non-experts (16 [14.75-17.25]; p = 0.01), and higher SRS scores (16.25 [16-16.88] vs. 13.5 [13.25-15]; p = 0.009). Step-specific advantages were observed in surgical flow (p = 0.025) and knot tying (p = 0.018). Although global operative time was shorter in experts (29.3 vs. 52.8 min), it was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). Most participants described the model as realistic, useful, and representative of actual surgical conditions.
conclusionThis validated, reusable model provides strong educational value for advanced laparoscopic pelvic training and structured skill acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41261247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.