Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261239›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Influence of treatment modalities on survival and progression free survival in primary spinal cord glioblastoma: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Pedro Lucas Negromonte Guerra, Inaê Carolline Silveira Silva, Deoclides Lima, Mateus Rodrigues Souza, Tomoo Inoue, Toshiki Endo, Eduardo Vieira Carvalho Júnior

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro Lucas Negromonte GuerraHospital da Restauração, Recife, Brazil. pedronegromontee@gmail.com.
Inaê Carolline Silveira SilvaHospital da Restauração, Recife, Brazil.
Deoclides LimaHospital da Restauração, Recife, Brazil.
Mateus Rodrigues SouzaHospital da Restauração, Recife, Brazil.
Tomoo InoueSaitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Toshiki EndoTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Eduardo Vieira Carvalho JúniorHospital da Restauração, Recife, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system, primarily affecting the brain. It infrequently occurs in the spinal cord, accounting for approximately 1.5% of all spinal cord tumors. Primary spinal cord GBM (sGBM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 12-15 months and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.5 months. This study performed a systematic review and a individual participant data meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of various therapeutic strategies on OS and PFS in patients with sGBM.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, data from 278 patients extracted from 116 studies were analyzed. The literature search was conducted in August 2025 using the PubMed and Embase databases. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the log-rank test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.

resultsThe average age was 31 years, with a predominance of males (57.5%). Most patients underwent STR (63.6%) and received adjuvant treatment (84.6%). Mean OS was 16.1 months, while mean PFS was 11.6 months. Chemotherapy (CT) and Radiotherapy (RT) were associated with improved prognosis. Moreover, patients who underwent gross total resection (GTR) showed a lower risk of mortality compared with those who underwent Bx.

conclusionChemotherapy, radiotherapy, and gross total resection demonstrated significant benefits for both OS and PFS. These findings underscore the relevance of adjuvant therapies and surgical extent in the management of primary spinal GBM. Future studies should address the impact of tumor genetic and molecular profiles on survival outcomes.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaSpinal Cord NeoplasmsAdultCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleProgression-Free SurvivalGlioblastomaMeta AnalysisPrimary spinal cord GBMPrimary spinal cord GBM outcomePrimary spinal cord GBM progressionSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.