Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261184›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Classically studied coherent structures only paint a partial picture of wall-bounded turbulence.

Andrés Cremades, Sergio Hoyas, Ricardo Vinuesa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Explainable AI: learning from the learners.Nature communications · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrés CremadesInstituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia, Valencia, Spain. andrescb@kth.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7052-4913
Sergio HoyasInstituto Universitario de Matemática Pura y Aplicada, Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8458-7288
Ricardo VinuesaFLOW, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. rvinuesa@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6570-5499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the last 140 years, the mechanisms of transport and dissipation of energy in a turbulent flow have not been completely understood. Previous research has focused on analyzing the so-called coherent structures, organized flow patterns characterized by their spatial coherence, lifespan and significant contribution to momentum and energy transfer. However, the connection between these structures and the flow development is still uncertain. Here, we show a data-driven methodology for objectively identifying high-importance regions. A deep-learning model is trained to predict a future state of the flow and the gradient-SHAP explainability algorithm is used to calculate the importance of each grid point. Finally, high-importance regions are computed using the SHAP data and are compared to the other coherent structures. The SHAP analysis provides an objective way to identify the regions of higher importance, which exhibit different levels of agreement with the classical structures without being completely related to any particular one.

Identifiers

PMID41261184
PMCPMC12630638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.