Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41261183›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative biosafety and efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens PFS and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZPZ against Ralstonia solanacearum.

Astghik Pepoyan, Michael Leonidas Chikindas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Astghik PepoyanDepartment of Food Safety and Biotechnology, Armenian National Agrarian University, 74 Teryan St., 0009, Yerevan, Armenia. apepoyan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1935-5341
Michael Leonidas ChikindasHealth Promoting Naturals Laboratory, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers State University, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Funding

RA Higher Education and Science Committee 21AG-4D065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of increasing environmental variability, the biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum, one of the most destructive plant pathogens worldwide, remains a pressing challenge. While Pseudomonas fluorescens strains have demonstrated biocontrol efficacy, concerns remain regarding their ecological safety within the One Health framework. These include the production of antimicrobial compounds contributing to resistance gene dissemination, variable efficacy across environments and strains, and occasional adverse effects on plant immunity. As a potential alternative, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum ZPZ, a lactic acid bacterium with GRAS status and cross-domain probiotic features, was comparatively assessed for its efficacy and biosafety profile against R. solanacearum. In vitro experiments showed that the cell-free supernatant of Lpb. plantarum ZPZ inhibited the growth of R. solanacearum by 72.46 ± 14.42% based on OD

Indexed as

Lactiplantibacillus plantarumPlant DiseasesProbioticsPseudomonas fluorescensRalstonia solanacearumBiocontrolBiosafetyLactiplantibacillus plantarumMicrobial technologyOne HealthPseudomonas fluorescensRalstonia solanacearum

Identifiers

PMID41261183
PMCPMC12630949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.