ArticleNature communications2025
High-accuracy protein complex structure modeling based on sequence-derived structure complementarity.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient global accuracy estimation for protein complex structural models using multi-view representation learning.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- High-throughput yeast engineering in biofoundries: towards autonomous and scalable synthetic biology.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided discovery of a lead compound with antifolate-like activity against bacterial and human thymidylate synthases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Benchmarking antibody modeling tools across structure prediction, docking, and paratope-epitope interface analysis.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Protein structure prediction powered by artificial intelligence: from biochemical foundations to practical applications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- High-accuracy protein complex structure modeling based on sequence-derived structure complementarity.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In living organisms, proteins perform key functions required for life activities by interacting to form complexes. Determining the protein complex structure is crucial for understanding and mastering biological functions. Although AlphaFold2 makes a revolutionary breakthrough in predicting protein monomeric structures, accurately capturing inter-chain interaction signals and modeling the structures of protein complexes remain a formidable challenge. In this work, we report DeepSCFold, a pipeline for improving protein complex structure modeling. DeepSCFold uses sequence-based deep learning models to predict protein-protein structural similarity and interaction probability, providing a foundation for identifying interaction partners and constructing deep paired multiple-sequence alignments (MSAs) for protein complex structure prediction. Benchmark results show that DeepSCFold significantly increases the accuracy of protein complex structure prediction compared with state-of-the-art methods. For multimer targets from CASP15, DeepSCFold achieves an improvement of 11.6% and 10.3% in TM-score compared to AlphaFold-Multimer and AlphaFold3, respectively. Furthermore, when applied to antibody-antigen complexes from the SAbDab database, DeepSCFold enhances the prediction success rate for antibody-antigen binding interfaces by 24.7% and 12.4% over AlphaFold-Multimer and AlphaFold3, respectively. These results demonstrate that DeepSCFold effectively captures intrinsic and conserved protein-protein interaction patterns through sequence-derived structure-aware information, rather than relying solely on sequence-level co-evolutionary signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.