ReviewCommunications chemistry2025
Harnessing the structural evolution of metal-organic frameworks under electrocatalytic conditions.
Review in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catalytic MOFs under Operation: From Static Descriptors to Dynamic Mechanistic Control.Accounts of chemical research · 2026Article
- Multifunctional UiO-66 MOFs in Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction: A New Horizon in Green Ammonia Synthesis.ACS organic & inorganic Au · 2026Review
- A Dynamic Surface Metal-Organic Framework Electrocatalyst: Potential-Driven Activation of Atomically Defined Au Sites for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Revisiting MOF-Derived Single-Atom Electrocatalysts: Limitations, Characterizations, and Design Strategies.Nano letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are often dismissed in electrocatalysis due to their structural "instability" under operating conditions. In this Perspective, we reframe MOF evolution in electrocatalytic conditions as a controllable pathway for accessing highly active catalytic species, such as metal (oxy)hydroxides, surface defects, and open metal centers. We highlight how leveraging structural evolution, rather than complete degradation, can be harnessed through rational design and activation strategies. Operando/in-situ techniques are highlighted as essential tools for tracking in-situ structural dynamics and associated evolution mechanisms. By integrating these design, characterization, and modeling insights, this Perspective outlines a framework for turning structural evolution into a powerful tool for catalytic functionality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.