ArticleScientific data2025
Pennsieve: A Collaborative Platform for Translational Neuroscience and Beyond.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Accelerating the development of bioelectronic medicine: outcomes and innovations from the NIH SPARC initiative.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
- The seizure embedding map: a spatio-temporal transformer for comparing patients by ictal intracranial EEG features at scale.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Eras of bioinformatics technologies from command-line interfaces to artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- A multimodal epilepsy dataset of paired 3-Tesla and 7-Tesla MRI and intracranial EEG.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Opportunities and pitfalls of data contextualization in neuroimaging.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Introducing Data Descriptors: A New Article Type to Advance Data-Driven Science.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2026Article
- Timing is everything: Expert opinion on researching epilepsy rhythms by the ILAE Task Force on Chronobiology.Epilepsia · 2026Review
- Multi-expert consensus annotations of spontaneous and stimulation-induced seizures in stereotactic EEG.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- The Seizure Embedding Map: A Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Comparing Patients by Ictal Intracranial EEG Features at Scale.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A guide to developing harmonized research workflows in a team science context.Experimental neurology · 2025Review
- Annotating neurophysiologic data at scale with optimized human input.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Guidance for sharing computational models of neural stimulation: from project planning to publication.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Designing and implementing solution-oriented team science initiatives-a chronic pain example.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The exponential growth of neuroscientific data necessitates platforms for data management and multidisciplinary collaboration. In this paper, we introduce Pennsieve, an open-source, cloud-based scientific data management platform that supports findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data sharing. It has integrated tools for data visualization, processing, and peer-reviewed data publishing that promote collaborative research and high-quality datasets optimized for downstream analysis, both in the cloud and on-premises. Pennsieve welcomes data submissions from individual investigators and small labs through entire consortia. It already serves more than 80 research groups worldwide and forms the core for several large-scale, interinstitutional projects and major government neuroscience research programs. Pennsieve stores over 125 TB of scientific data, with 35 TB of data publicly available in more than 350 high-impact datasets. By facilitating scientific data management, discovery, and analysis, Pennsieve fosters a robust and collaborative research ecosystem for neuroscience and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.