ArticleInorganic chemistry2025
Playing with Structural Parameters in the Design of Ruthenium(II)-
Article in Inorganic chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectroscopic characterization and geometry optimization of a ruthenium(II) complex with a limonene-derived amino-oxime ligand: DFT/TD-DFT inspection, in silico molecular docking, and dynamics simulations for a potent cancer drug.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Pyrazolyl-Pyridine Ruthenium Complexes: A New Metallic Line of Defense Against Acinetobacter baumannii.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A series of ruthenium(II) arene complexes of the general formula [(η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.