ArticlePersonality and mental health2025
Interpersonal Problems and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: An Investigation Using the Interpersonal Circumplex.
Article in Personality and mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personality Traits and Psychological Well-Being: Association Within the "Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra" (SUN) Cohort.Personality and mental health · 2026Article
- Interpersonal Problems and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: An Investigation Using the Interpersonal Circumplex.Personality and mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central feature of personality disorders (PDs) is interpersonal problems, which can be effectively conceptualized using the interpersonal circumplex (IPC). This study replicates and extends previous research on the relationship between the dimensional DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and interpersonal problems, as there are only a few studies in this area. The Structural Summary Method (SSM) was used in a sample of 168 psychiatric inpatients who completed Criterion A and B measures according to the AMPD: The Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1), the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-BF 2.0), and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5-BF+). Additionally, general and specific interpersonal problems were assessed with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C). We found associations of both Criteria A and B of the AMPD with general interpersonal distress. Criterion A domains did not map cleanly onto the IPC's meta-concepts of agency and communion; only a subset yielded interpretable circumplex profiles, primarily in the interpersonal functioning domain. Criterion B domains generally showed clearer and more specific associations, with most mapping onto domineering and cold interpersonal problems but showing little association with nonassertive or maladaptive warm problems. These results support and extend previous evidence of empirical links between the AMPD and the IPC, highlighting the IIP-C's value for comprehensive assessment of interpersonal problems in PD. Further research is needed to clarify the overlap and distinctions between these models and to identify the interpersonal problems most relevant for treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.