Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41260910›Full record

ArticleGut2026

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: 2022 audit update.

Gaurav B Nigam, Kathryn Oakland, Sarah Hearnshaw, John Grasnt-Casey, Paul Davies, Paula Dhiman, Shane W Goodwin, Bhaskar Kumar, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Joanna A Leithead and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Gaurav B NigamTranslational Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK gaurav.nigam@ouh.nhs.uk acdouds@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4699-2263
Kathryn OaklandDigestive Diseases Department, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-1138
Sarah HearnshawNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John Grasnt-CaseyNational Comparative Audit Office, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.
Paul DaviesNational Comparative Audit Office, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.
Paula DhimanCenter for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford, UK.
Shane W GoodwinDepartment of Medicine, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Bhaskar KumarUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Elizabeth RatcliffeWrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK.
Joanna A LeitheadForth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9443-4552
Raman UberoiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Lise EstcourtNHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Vipul JairathDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8603-898X
Simon P L TravisTranslational Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Mike F MurphyNHS Blood and Transplant; Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Adrian StanleyGastroenterology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9761-9795
Andrew DoudsGastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK gaurav.nigam@ouh.nhs.uk acdouds@gmail.com.
AUGIB audit 2022 collaborator, UK

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research 302607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) is a common medical emergency with evolving demographics and management strategies, particularly in medical/endoscopic therapy and transfusion strategies.

objectiveTo provide key data of the most recent 2022 UK audit and compare it with the preceding audit in 2007.

designProspective multicentre audit conducted from 3 May to 2 July 2022, including adults (≥16 years) with AUGIB across 147 UK hospitals (response rate 86% vs 84% in 2007). AUGIB was defined by clinical symptoms (haematemesis, haematochezia, coffee ground vomiting or melaena confirmed by medical personnel). Patients were followed until discharge, death or 28 days, with re-admissions during the study period counted as new episodes.

resultsAmong 5141 patients (59% male; median age 69), 15% had cirrhosis, 19% reported excess alcohol use, 7% used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and 46% were on antithrombotics. Most (77%) were new admissions, who were younger with fewer comorbidities, while the remainder bled during hospitalisation. Peptic ulcer disease accounted for 32% of cases, varices for 10% and no abnormality was found in 33%. Pre-endoscopic risk stratification was not performed in 42%.Compared with 2007, patients in 2022 had higher comorbidity (67% vs 50%), more cirrhosis (15% vs 9%), greater anticoagulant use (31% vs 13%) and higher transfusion rates (50% vs 43%). In 2022, among early transfusions (pre-endoscopy or within first 24 hrs; 38%), 43% were given at haemoglobin (Hb)>70 g/L, with 24% classified as inappropriate due to haemodynamic stability. A signal of harm was observed: while inappropriate transfusion was not associated with rebleeding at either 70 or 80 g/L, at 80 g/L it was linked to higher adjusted mortality (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.60, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.56).Inpatient endoscopy was more common (83% vs 74%), though endotherapy use remained modest (27% vs 23%). Salvage therapy rates were unchanged (3.3% vs 3.1%) but shifted from surgery to interventional radiology. Outcomes improved, with lower rebleeding (9.7% vs 13.3%), reduced in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs 10.0%) and shorter median stay (5 vs 6 days). In multivariate analysis, mortality was independently predicted by older age (≥80 years: aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.30), shock (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.17) and comorbidity, while lower Hb at presentation increased risk (≤70 g/L: aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.11). Anticoagulant use was associated with increased mortality (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.85), whereas NSAID use (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.96) and antiplatelet use (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.87) were associated with lower mortality.

conclusionsDespite a higher-risk case mix and incomplete adherence to guidelines (notably in transfusion thresholds and risk stratification), outcomes in AUGIB have improved. The observation of increased mortality with liberal transfusion above 80 g/L in stable patients reinforces the importance of restrictive transfusion practice. Quality improvement initiatives focused on risk stratification, endoscopic training and multidisciplinary care could further enhance outcomes in the UK and internationally.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood TransfusionFemaleHumansMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited KingdomYoung AdultAUDITENDOSCOPYGASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDINGGASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE

Identifiers

PMID41260910
PMCPMC13018800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.