Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41260885›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

Risk of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma following non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Keiran J C Pace, Jethro C C Kwong, Harkanwal Randhawa, Maximiliano Ringa, Zizo Al-Daqqaq, Yashan Chelliahpillai, Soomin Lee, Kellie Kim, Samuel Haile, Amna Ali and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Keiran J C PaceTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jethro C C KwongDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4728-1025
Harkanwal RandhawaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maximiliano RingaInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Zizo Al-DaqqaqTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yashan ChelliahpillaiTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Soomin LeeTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kellie KimTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4682-6409
Samuel HaileTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amna AliInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Marian WettsteinDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy ChanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nathan PerlisDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jason LeeDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert HamiltonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neil FleshnerDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antonio FinelliDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Munir JamalDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Frank PapanikolaouDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas ShortDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew FeiferDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Girish KulkarniDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandre R ZlottaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the risk and timing of metachronous upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this multi-institutional retrospective cohort study involving academic and community hospitals, clinicopathological data were collected from patients with NMIBC treated between 2005 and 2022. Patients with prior or synchronous UTUC at NMIBC diagnosis were excluded. The primary outcome was time to metachronous UTUC, confirmed on pathology or upper tract imaging. Secondary objectives included determining the cumulative incidence of UTUC stratified by the European Association of Urology risk groups and UTUC risk factors identified using Fine and Gray regression, with all-cause mortality as a competing risk.

resultsAmong 3003 patients, 1158 (39%) were low-risk, 650 (22%) intermediate-risk, 944 (31%) high-risk, and 251 (8%) very high-risk. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.9 (2.7-8.4) years, 104 patients developed UTUC. On multivariable analysis, multiple tumours were an independent predictor of UTUC (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.24-2.80; P = 0.003). The 10-year cumulative incidence was 2.2% for low-risk, 4.4% for intermediate-risk, and 6.3% for high- and very high-risk patients. Routine imaging detected UTUC in 40% of low-risk, 58% of intermediate-risk, and 53% of high- and very high-risk patients. High-grade UTUC was found in 36% of low-risk, 63% of intermediate-risk, and 64% of high- and very high-risk patients. The majority of UTUC cases (77%) occurred within 5 years of NMIBC.

conclusionsThe contemporary risk of metachronous UTUC may be lower than historical data. Our findings demonstrate that UTUC incidence is low in patients with low- and intermediate-risk NMIBC and increases in the high- and very high-risk groups. These results support current guideline recommendations to omit routine upper tract imaging in low-risk NMIBC and question its utility in intermediate-risk disease. In high-risk patients, routine imaging remains warranted, although the optimal frequency and duration are yet to be determined.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryUreteral NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsnon‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancerrecurrencerisk stratificationsurveillance imagingupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41260885
PMCPMC12907774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.