ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026
Anatomical and histological characterization of solitary lobules of the monostomatic sublingual gland in dogs.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Stepwise Integrative Approach to Managing a Refractory Recurrent Cervical Sialocele in a Dog.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sialocele recurrence in dogs following surgical excision of the monostomatic sublingual gland is often attributed to incomplete removal of sublingual gland tissue posterior to the site of duct rupture, suggested as solitary lobules of the monostomatic sublingual gland. Here we examined these solitary lobules in six healthy beagle cadavers. Gross anatomical observation revealed solitary lobules distributed along the major sublingual duct and separated from the rostral lobe of the monostomatic sublingual gland. Histologically, the solitary lobules were connected to the major sublingual duct and showed a mixed glandular structure similar to the monostomatic sublingual gland but distinct from the polystomatic sublingual gland. These findings elucidate the anatomical basis of sialocele recurrence and emphasize the importance of completely excising solitary lobules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.