ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Correlation between Running Average of Serum Uric Acid Levels and Clinical Course in Secondary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Long-term uric acid exposure as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease remains unclear. This study investigated whether or not the running average serum uric acid (Ra-SUA) value measured after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could be associated with the occurrence of subsequent cardiovascular events. Methods The clinical records of 1,761 patients who underwent successful PCI were retrospectively examined. The Ra-SUA values were calculated by adding consecutive SUA values and dividing them by the number of measurements. Based on the Ra-SUA value during an observation period of up to 10 years after PCI, the patients were divided into 3 groups based on the Ra-SUA: >7.0, 5.5-7.0, and ≤5.5 mg/dL. Among these groups, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) was investigated. Furthermore, patients with Ra-SUA ≤5.5 mg/dL were further classified into 3 groups according to Ra-SUA values to investigate the association with the incidence of MACEs. MACEs were defined as coronary-related death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and new coronary stenosis of non-culprit lesions. Results A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in patients with Ra-SUA >7.0 mg/dL than in the other groups. A multivariate analysis indicated that the Ra-SUA value was significantly correlated with the incidence of MACEs. However, patients with Ra-SUA <4.0 mg/dL had an increased incidence of MACEs compared with patients with Ra-SUA 4.0-5.0 mg/dL. Conclusion High Ra-SUA values may be a predictor of increased recurrence of cardiovascular disease after PCI. There may also be a J-curve association between the incidence of MACEs and Ra-SUA values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.