ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Implicit learning across varying temporal scales in individuals with and without mood instability.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mood instability and cognitive impairment are important features of several psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder (BD). However, little is known about how they might be related when measured simultaneously and longitudinally. This 10-week prospective, between-subjects experimental study used digital remote monitoring to capture mood and cognition, and instability in these measures. Two groups of participants were recruited: a 'high MDQ' group (n = 37), scoring ≥7 on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) with high daily mood instability, and a 'low MDQ' group (n = 37), scoring ≤5 on the MDQ with low daily mood instability. Five days a week, for 10 weeks, participants completed mood ratings and a contextual cueing task that assessed implicit learning of regularities presented over different temporal scales. Participants with high MDQ scores demonstrated shallower slopes of learning for contextual cueing across days, but not within experimental sessions, compared to individuals with low MDQ scores. Mood instability was not associated with greater instability in reaction times to novel targets. For all participants, learning slopes were significantly steeper for targets repeated more frequently across experimental sessions, e.g. daily compared to alternate days, and within experimental sessions e.g. repeated compared to novel trials, demonstrating successful contextual cueing over varying temporal scales. Our findings highlight that individuals with high levels of mood instability may be less effective at detecting and integrating stimulus regularities across days. Concurrent and high-frequency digital remote monitoring of mood and cognition is feasible and can be used to elucidate relationships between mood instability and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.