Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41260366›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026

Implicit learning across varying temporal scales in individuals with and without mood instability.

L Z Atkinson, N Zokaei, P Panchal, N Nelissen, K E A Saunders, M F S Rushworth, D Darby, J R Geddes, C J Harmer, P J Harrison and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

L Z AtkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
N ZokaeiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
P PanchalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
N NelissenDWP Digital, Quarry House, Quarry Hill, Leeds, United Kingdom.
K E A SaundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
M F S RushworthDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
D DarbyDepartment of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
C J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
P J HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
A C NobreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology and Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, CT, United States. Electronic address: kia.nobre@yale.edu.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102616Wellcome Trust 203139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mood instability and cognitive impairment are important features of several psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder (BD). However, little is known about how they might be related when measured simultaneously and longitudinally. This 10-week prospective, between-subjects experimental study used digital remote monitoring to capture mood and cognition, and instability in these measures. Two groups of participants were recruited: a 'high MDQ' group (n = 37), scoring ≥7 on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) with high daily mood instability, and a 'low MDQ' group (n = 37), scoring ≤5 on the MDQ with low daily mood instability. Five days a week, for 10 weeks, participants completed mood ratings and a contextual cueing task that assessed implicit learning of regularities presented over different temporal scales. Participants with high MDQ scores demonstrated shallower slopes of learning for contextual cueing across days, but not within experimental sessions, compared to individuals with low MDQ scores. Mood instability was not associated with greater instability in reaction times to novel targets. For all participants, learning slopes were significantly steeper for targets repeated more frequently across experimental sessions, e.g. daily compared to alternate days, and within experimental sessions e.g. repeated compared to novel trials, demonstrating successful contextual cueing over varying temporal scales. Our findings highlight that individuals with high levels of mood instability may be less effective at detecting and integrating stimulus regularities across days. Concurrent and high-frequency digital remote monitoring of mood and cognition is feasible and can be used to elucidate relationships between mood instability and cognition.

Indexed as

AffectBipolar DisorderLearningMood DisordersAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReaction TimeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttentionCognitionContextual cueingImplicit learningMood instabilityRemote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41260366
PMCPMC7618815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.