Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41260235›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Canopy reflectance as a predictor of soil microbial community composition and diversity at a continental scale.

Angela Harris, Richard D Bardgett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela HarrisDepartment of Geography, School of Environment Education and Development (SEED), University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2184-0274
Richard D BardgettLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-0127

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canopy reflectance captures plant traits related to ecological processes, which may reflect the composition of soil microbial communities. However, the extent to which canopy reflectance can help elucidate soil microbial community composition and diversity across biomes remains unclear. Using data from 14 National Ecological Observatory Network ecoregions (domains), we linked plant traits to soil microbial composition and diversity (characterised by phospholipid fatty acids and 16S rRNA gene sequencing) and built partial least squares regression models to predict soil microbial attributes from airborne imaging spectroscopy at the continental scale. The ability of remote sensing to predict soil microbial communities was mediated by plant attributes that both directly influence microbial communities and reflect shared responses to soil and climate gradients. Model validation accuracy varied with taxonomic resolution (normalised root mean squared error, 10.1-24%; coefficient of determination, 0.27-0.86), with models of broad soil microbial groups performing best, although bacterial community composition and diversity could also be modelled with moderate levels of accuracy (normalised root mean squared error, 12.5-18.6%; coefficient of determination, 0.43-0.61). Models using full-spectrum hyperspectral data consistently outperformed those based on simple vegetation indices, highlighting the value of imaging spectroscopy for soil microbial research.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaLeast-Squares AnalysisPlantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilcanopy reflectancefoliar traitsimaging spectroscopyNEONsoil microbial community

Identifiers

PMID41260235
PMCPMC12712435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.