Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259657›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026

The role of women in imaging: the evidence.

Fiona J Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, Clinical School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-9962

Funding

Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203312Department of Health and Social CareNIHRThe European Society of Radiology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of x-rays, the role of women in imaging has become increasingly important. Reflecting changes in the roles of women in society, and the increasing acceptance of women's effective and complementary contribution to the workforce, the number of women working in imaging has increased in the past few decades. This is due in part to the change from male-only medical schools early last century to equal numbers of male and female medical students in many countries by the 1970s. Radiology is an attractive career option for women, and over the past 2 decades the proportion of women in the field has increased to approximately 41%. This has resulted in an increase in the number of women in leadership roles. This article examines the evidence for women in various roles, explores why having women in positions of influence is important, and looks at trends in the data. The recent move away from Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives is disappointing, as these measures helped increase the number of women in senior roles. It is clear there are many opportunities for professional women to step up and we should encourage and support them to do so.

Indexed as

Physicians, WomenRadiologyCareer ChoiceFemaleHumansLeadershipaffirmative actioncareerEDIleadershipradiologywomen

Identifiers

PMID41259657
PMCPMC13070632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.