ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
The role of women in imaging: the evidence.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Since the discovery of x-rays, the role of women in imaging has become increasingly important. Reflecting changes in the roles of women in society, and the increasing acceptance of women's effective and complementary contribution to the workforce, the number of women working in imaging has increased in the past few decades. This is due in part to the change from male-only medical schools early last century to equal numbers of male and female medical students in many countries by the 1970s. Radiology is an attractive career option for women, and over the past 2 decades the proportion of women in the field has increased to approximately 41%. This has resulted in an increase in the number of women in leadership roles. This article examines the evidence for women in various roles, explores why having women in positions of influence is important, and looks at trends in the data. The recent move away from Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives is disappointing, as these measures helped increase the number of women in senior roles. It is clear there are many opportunities for professional women to step up and we should encourage and support them to do so.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.