ArticleNoise & health
Improving the Recovery of Haemato-Oncological Inpatients by Implementing a Multifaceted Noise Control Programme.
Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveInvestigate the effect of implementing a multidirectional noise control programme on the rehabilitation outcomes of hospitalised haemato-oncological patients.
methodsThe clinical data of haemato-oncological patients who received their first chemotherapy treatment in Ganzhou People's Hospital between March 2022 and February 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were categorised into the noise reduction group and the conventional group in accordance with whether they had received the multidirectional noise control programme during their hospitalisation. A total of 72 cases were included in the final noise reduction group and 73 cases in the conventional group. The measurement of the acoustic environment in the wards of both groups and the monitoring of various serological indicators, such as the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), were used to evaluate the clinical effects of the multidirectional noise control programme. In addition, patient satisfaction with health care services was evaluated using the Inpatient Satisfaction and Experience Monitoring scale.
resultsAfter the implementation of the noise control intervention, the ward noise levels of the noise reduction group were significantly lower than those of the conventional group (P < 0.001). After the intervention, the noise reduction group exhibited significantly lower levels of norepinephrine, adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol compared with those of the conventional group (P < 0.05). The GHQ-12 and PSQI scores of the patients in the noise reduction group were significantly lower than those of the patients in the conventional group after the end of the programme (P < 0.001). In addition, the satisfaction scores with the clinical medical services of the patients in the noise reduction group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the conventional group (P < 0.001).
conclusionSystematic noise management significantly improved the sleep quality and mood and stress levels of haemato-oncological inpatients whilst enhancing medical satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.