Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259608›Full record

Observational studyNoise & health

Acoustic Conditions and Student Perceptions in a Québec Classroom: A Case Study.

Timothy Pommée, Rachel Bouserhal, Tiffany Chang, Florence Renaud, Cecilia Maria Ferreira Borges, Annelies Bockstael, Ingrid Verduyckt

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy PomméeÉcole D'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Rachel BouserhalÉcole de Technologie Supérieure, Department of Electrical Engineering, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Tiffany ChangÉcole D'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Florence RenaudUniversité de Montréal, Département de Psychologie, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Cecilia Maria Ferreira BorgesUniversité de Montréal, Département de Psychopédagogie et D'andragogie, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Annelies BockstaelArtevelde University of Applied Sciences, Health and Care Research Center, Ghent, Belgium.
Ingrid VerduycktÉcole D'orthophonie et d'audiologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough several studies have reported negative impacts of classroom noise on learning, few have examined students' subjective perceptions of their acoustic environment. This cross-sectional observational case study of a single classroom explored how adolescents aged 12 to 13 years evaluated their classroom soundscape and related perceptions to objective noise measurements.

methodsOver 11 school days, several groups of students completed a questionnaire at the end of each class period (N = 957), indicating whether they felt annoyed/distracted, indifferent, or content/focused in relation to the acoustic environment, and providing free-text comments. Simultaneously, acoustic indicators (LAeq, LA10, LA90, LAmax, LA10-LA90) were recorded using calibrated sound level meters.

resultsPeriods with higher LAeq, LA10, and LAmax values were significantly associated with fewer students feeling content/focused (r = -0.49 to -0.59; P < 0.05). At the individual level, correlations between acoustic measures and evaluations were weak (r = -0.14 to -0.19). Qualitative analysis of students' comments identified four perceptual modes of acoustic experience: intensity, soundscape, source, and autocentric impressions. Most students used only one mode and rarely made explicit connections between sound and learning.

conclusionFindings from this single-classroom case study suggest that while higher continuous and peak noise levels are modestly associated with increased annoyance and reduced focus, these effects are limited. Because some student groups visited the classroom repeatedly, the data are not fully independent; and results should be interpreted with caution. This study highlights the need for larger, multiclassroom investigations combining subjective and objective data, and for tools supporting teacher noise management and student awareness.

Indexed as

NoiseSchoolsStudentsAcousticsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQuebecSurveys and QuestionnairesacousticsNoiseperceptionschoolsstudents

Identifiers

PMID41259608
PMCPMC12677273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.