ReviewNoise & health
Data Driven Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Aircraft Noise and Health Effects.
Review in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Psychoacoustic Feature Extraction and Spatio-Temporal Analysis Framework for Continuous Aircraft Noise Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe substantial growth in global air traffic has expanded the range of aircraft noise impacts the health outcomes, making aircraft noise a key limiting factor for future airport expansions. This study presents a comprehensive review and data-driven bibliometric analysis of the health outcomes of aircraft noise, aiming to clarify the network structure and development trends in this research field.
methodsRelevant keywords (aircraft, airport noise hazard, annoyance, exposure, damage, risk, illness, resident, worker health, sound quality) were used to extract literature from the Web of Science database, covering the period from 2001 to May 2024. Only journal articles were retained, and publications in unrelated fields were excluded. Visualization was performed using Citespace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix.
resultsA total of 1512 articles were analyzed. The number of publications increased significantly in 2019. "Annoyance" and "exposure" were among the most frequently used keywords. The top co-cited journals were Journal of Acoustical Society of America (JASA, 2334 citations), Noise and Health (1315 citations), and Journal of Sound and Vibration (JSV, 1298 citations). The analysis also summarized preliminary quantitative results on noise metrics and health outcomes. For example, an increase of 10 dB in day-evening-night noise exposure was associated with a 1.09% increase in the exposure-response relationship for ischemic heart disease.
conclusionAircraft noise has been shown to adversely affect human health, contributing to sleep disturbance, cardiovascular disease, and decreased quality of life in airport communities. This study advocates for effective measures to reduce the health impacts of airport noise on communities and highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address the complex health issues caused by aircraft noise. In the future, a comprehensive synthesis and categorization of research directions in this field could help identify emerging topics and general trends, thereby supporting the development of more effective airport noise management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.