ArticleCoDAS2025
Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: comparison with older people with dysphagia and relationship with time since diagnosis.
Article in CoDAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose(1) to compare the findings of the instrumental swallowing assessment between individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and older dysphagic adults without neurological diagnosis; (2) to compare the onset of pharyngeal response, pharyngeal residues, and the level of oral intake in relation to the time since diagnosis in the ALS group.
methodsThis cross-sectional, retrospective study collected data from medical records. Altogether, 101 individuals with dysphagia were included and stratified into two groups: the first had 56 patients diagnosed with ALS, and the second had 45 older adults. Dysphagia signs were analyzed through fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, using four food consistencies, classified by the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI). Pharyngeal residues were classified by the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), and oral intake by the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).
resultsThe ALS group had differences in multiple swallows with one IDDSI consistency; posterior oral leakage, pharyngeal residues, and laryngeal penetration with three consistencies; and aspiration with one consistency. Individuals with more than 3 years since diagnosis had differences in the onset of the pharyngeal response in the pyriform sinuses, moderate pharyngeal residues, and oral intake.
conclusionThe ALS group had significant differences in the occurrence of multiple swallows, posterior oral leakage, pharyngeal residues, penetration, and aspiration with three IDDSI consistencies. Furthermore, the time since diagnosis was a determining factor for all three parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.