ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2025
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff for Brazilian culture.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
to translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff into Brazilian Portuguese. the methodological study followed the stages of translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert evaluation and pre-testing. Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index and the Content Validity Ratio. Convergent and discriminant construct validity was verified using confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was checked by Cronbach's alpha, Composite Reliability and McDonald's Omega. 15 professionals took part in the content validation and 307 in the evaluation of the construct and reliability. Content validity obtained values above 0.87 for the Content Validity Index and 0.73 for the Content Validity Ratio. The confirmatory factor analysis distributed the 59 items in the 17 original domains, with average variance extracted greater than 0.49 and factor loadings greater than 0.61. Internal consistency showed Cronbach's alpha between 0.56 and 0.85; composite reliability between 0.75 and 0.89; and McDonald's Omega between 0.61 and 0.88. the Brazilian version of the Person-centered Practice Inventory-Staff demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability to assess the perception of person-centered care practice among nursing professionals in the hospital context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.