ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2025
Stigma, quality of life, and return-to-work outcomes among organ and tissue transplant recipients in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOrgan transplantation improves survival rates and quality of life; however, reintegration into the workforce remains a challenge. Therefore, this study examined the relationship among return-to-work, quality of life, and perceived stigma in Brazilian transplant recipients.
methodsThis cross-sectional study assessed stigma, quality of life (using the Short Form-36), and employment status in 352 transplant recipients. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves, regression models, and factor analysis to identify key return-to-work and stigma determinants.
resultsThe average return-to-work rate was 53.7%, with socioeconomic class, prior employment, and organ transplantation type positively influencing return-to-work. Stigma negatively impacted return-to-work and quality of life, especially Functional Capacity and Mental Health. Older age, racial disparities, and socioeconomic inequities were significant return-to-work barriers.
conclusionReturn-to-work was observed in 53.7% of transplant recipients, with rates declining over time. Higher return-to-work was associated with pre-transplant employment, higher socioeconomic status, and organ transplant type. Stigma negatively impacted both return-to-work and quality of life. Return-to-work disparities were evident in terms of age, race, and income. Pre-transplant employment has emerged as the strongest return-to-work predictor. Overcoming these structural barriers is essential for optimizing long-term outcomes and ensuring that transplant recipients fully reintegrate into their occupational lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.