Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259490›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology2025

Epidemiology in health policies, programs, and services in Brazil: The trajectories and perspectives from ABRASCO's Fifth Strategic Plan for the Development of Epidemiology in Brazil (2025-2029).

Laio Magno, Ligia Regina de Oliveira, Maria Rita Donalísio, Gerusa Gibson, Bárbara Campos Silva Valente, Alícia Krüger, Sheila Maria Alvim de Matos, Maria da Glória Teixeira, Alberto Novaes Ramos Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laio MagnoUniversidade do Estado da Bahia, Department of Life Sciences - Salvador (BA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-0782
Ligia Regina de OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Department of Public Health - Cuiabá (MT), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7325-1391
Maria Rita DonalísioUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Department of Public Health - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-9897
Gerusa GibsonUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9499-731X
Bárbara Campos Silva ValenteFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio - Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-7394
Alícia KrügerMinistry of Health, Secretariat of Health and Environment Surveillance, Office for Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity Policies - Brasília (DF), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9154-8412
Sheila Maria Alvim de MatosUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva - Salvador (BA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-9213
Maria da Glória TeixeiraUniversidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva - Salvador (BA), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3318-3408
Alberto Novaes Ramos JuniorUniversidade Federal do Ceará, School of Medicine, Graduate Program in Public Health - Fortaleza (CE), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-1757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo critically summarize the key topics addressed by the working group "Epidemiology in Health Policies, Programs, and Services" during the development of the Fifth Strategic Plan for the Development of Epidemiology in Brazil (2025-2029), led by the Brazilian Association of Collective Health.

methodsA historical-contextual analysis was conducted, based on an analytical and comparative review of institutional documents, including previous versions of the Master Plans, scientific literature, and experiences accumulated within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS).

resultsThe main themes identified were the limitations and potentialities of national health information systems, the challenges related to the production of reliable and high-quality data; the dilemmas involved in training epidemiologists with strong social and political commitments; the need to expand the scope of public health surveillance; the importance of equity-oriented evaluation processes; and the role of intersectoral and territorial articulation in strengthening the field. These discussions were framed within the context of Brazil's demographic, socioeconomic, and political-institutional transformations, highlighting the relevance of critical and ethical epidemiology committed to human rights.

conclusionThe Master Plans have played a strategic role in articulating science, policy, and practice, thereby consolidating epidemiology as a field of practice, a critical science, and a tool for social transformation. The Fifth Strategic Plan for the Development of Epidemiology in Brazil (2025-2029) emphasizes the necessity of innovative and intersectional approaches to overcoming structural inequalities, inequities, and forms of oppression. This contributes to strengthening the SUS and consolidating an ethical, critical, and socially committed epidemiology.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyHealth PolicyNational Health ProgramsBrazilHumansStrategic Planning

Identifiers

PMID41259490
PMCPMC12622982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.