ArticlePloS one2025
The percentile-matching technique for synthetic eye tracking signal degradation: A biometric case study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Do Two Eyes Identify Better than One? Interpretable Binocular Dynamics for Virtual Reality Gaze Biometrics.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript demonstrates an improved model-based approach for synthetic degradation of pre-recorded eye movement signals. Recordings from a high-quality eye tracking sensor are transformed to make their eye tracking signal quality resemble ones captured on a lower-quality target device. The proposed model improves the realism of the degraded signals versus prior approaches by introducing a mechanism for degrading spatial accuracy and temporal precision. Specifically, a percentile-matching technique is developed for mimicking the relative distributional structure of the target data signal quality characteristics. The model is demonstrated to improve realism on a per-feature and per-recording basis using data from EyeLink 1000 and SMI eye tracker embedded within a virtual reality platform. This study is first to show that the percentile-matching technique enables more accurate approximation of the target set using the biometric user authentication as an end task. Its mean absolute error of estimating the target set performance level is better for all three metrics considered (compared to the baseline) - a) 0.26 (versus 0.84) of d-prime; b) 12.08% (versus 31.10%) of False Rejection Rate at 1-in-10000 False Acceptance Rate; c) 3.08% (versus 4.69%) of Equal Error Rate. This paper also expands eye movement literature by suggesting an application-agnostic realism assessment workflow based on the 1 Nearest-Neighbor classifier. Our model improves the related median classification accuracy metric by 35.7% versus the benchmark model towards the ideal 50% value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.