Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41259405›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2025

Trends in assisted dying among patients with psychiatric disorders and dementia in Belgium: A health registry study.

Jacques Wels, Natasia Hamarat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacques WelsUniversity College London, Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing (LHA), London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9292-917X
Natasia HamaratUniversité libre de Bruxelles, Health & Society Research Unit, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted dying and euthanasia (ADE) for patients with psychiatric disorders or dementia have increased in jurisdictions where the practice is legal. In this study, we examine trends in euthanasia cases involving patients with these conditions in Belgium, where the law makes a distinction based on whether a patient's death is not expected in the foreseeable future (>12 months)-a common situation in cases of dementia or psychiatric disorders. METHODS AND

findingsWe use data on all cases of euthanasia reported to the Federal Commission for the Control and Evaluation of Euthanasia from 2002 (when the legislation was introduced) to 2023 (N = 33,592). Psychiatric disorders and dementia represent 1.27% and 0.92% of all cases, respectively. Using time-series zero-inflated negative binomial regression, we model trends by first examining interactions between euthanasia reasons and year, then extending to three-way interactions with patients' characteristics. The model calculates change in count and is replicated with an offset to account for demographic changes and generate rates. Our results show that euthanasia for psychiatric disorders and dementia showed distinct trends over time. Although slightly increasing, euthanasia for psychiatric disorders followed trends similar to the other types of euthanasia (count = 1.00 [95%CI: 0.98; 1.03]-rate = 1.02 [95%CI: 0.99; 1.04]), while euthanasia cases for dementia increased faster than other types of euthanasia (count = 1.03 [95%CI: 1.00; 1.06]-rate = 1.04 [95%CI: 1.01;1.07]). Trends in euthanasia for dementia and psychiatric disorders coincide with demographic changes. While euthanasia rates for psychiatric disorders were initially higher among women, the rate among men has been increasing over time. Regional trends show higher overall euthanasia rates in the Dutch-speaking population, but with faster increases in the French-speaking population. A key limitation of this study is the lack of information on patients' socio-economic profiles.

conclusionsIn Belgium, between 2002 and 2023, there are distinct trends for euthanasia for non-terminal illnesses. Euthanasia for psychiatric disorders followed similar trends as euthanasia for terminal illnesses, whereas euthanasia cases involving cognitive conditions increased at a faster rate. Furthermore, there were gender and regional differences, which diminished over time.

Indexed as

DementiaMental DisordersSuicide, AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumEuthanasiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistries

Identifiers

PMID41259405
PMCPMC12646481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.