ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
Landscape of Current Transplant Infectious Disease Training Programs.
Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Surviving to Thriving: Overcoming Early Career Challenges in Transplant Infectious Diseases.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
- Landscape of Current Transplant Infectious Disease Training Programs.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransplant infectious disease (TID) training is not accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and is not standardized. Prior surveys of the training landscape in TID have focused on fellow responses; we sought description of programs from program directors and coordinators.
methodsAlong with the American Society of Transplantation (AST) Infectious Disease Community of Practice (IDCOP), we administered a survey to adult and pediatric ID training programs focusing on the structure, funding, curriculum, and outcomes of ID fellows participating in TID fellowships and tracks. This manuscript is a work product of the American Society of Transplantation's Education Committee.
resultsWe had 42 respondents representing 15 adult TID fellowships, 12 adult TID tracks, 4 pediatric TID fellowships, and 6 pediatric TID tracks. Adult TID fellowships required slightly more inpatient weeks than adult TID tracks: 26 versus 24 (p = 0.03). A majority of adult TID fellowships 10/14 (71%) rely on multiple sources of funding for their programs. A total of 67% of adult and 75% of pediatric TID fellowships have didactic curriculum, distinct from their general fellowship, and 53% of adult TID fellowships and no pediatric TID fellowships have distinct core competencies to evaluate TID fellows. Most TID fellows are pursuing TID-focused clinical careers.
conclusionsSubstantial heterogeneity exists among TID fellowships, and between fellowships and tracks. Future directions include updating prior guidance for adult and pediatric TID tracks and fellowships on curriculum, core competencies, and baseline requirements to ensure adequate competency in the care of these vulnerable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.