ArticlePloS one2025
AutoScan3D: A low-cost, portable photogrammetry system for automated 3D digitization of anatomical specimens.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the development and preliminary validation of AutoScan3D, a portable and low-cost device for three-dimensional surface digitization of skulls using photogrammetry. The growing demand for accessible digitalization methods has encouraged the use of photogrammetry as a practical complement to high-end imaging technologies such as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), which, although capable of visualizing internal structures with superior resolution, remains expensive and requires specialized facilities. AutoScan3D automates photographic capture through a smartphone camera, stepper motors, and an Arduino UNO controller. The system integrates a camera positioning module and an object rotation module to standardize image acquisition at fixed intervals. Its performance was evaluated by comparing the resulting 3D models with reference models derived from micro-CT scans to verify geometric accuracy and surface reconstruction fidelity. The results indicate that AutoScan3D reliably reproduces external morphology with realistic photographic textures and compact file sizes that facilitate subsequent manipulation in modeling software. Although its spatial resolution is lower than that of micro-CT, the device's total hardware cost (≈USD 90) and ease of operation make it suitable for educational, demonstrative, and museographic contexts where external morphology is the main focus. Planned improvements include enhanced lighting control, compatibility with higher-resolution cameras, and a dedicated user interface. AutoScan3D thus provides a reproducible and affordable framework for surface-based three-dimensional digitization, expanding access to digital morphology tools in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.