ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Optimisation of a Cervical Cancer Screening Model Based on Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionCervical cancer remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women globally, despite the availability of effective prevention tools. The use of self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is a promising strategy to increase screening participation, particularly in settings dominated by opportunistic models. Understanding women's preferences regarding invitation methods and device design is essential to ensure effective and equitable programme implementation. This study explored the expectations, preferences, and perceived barriers of women aged 35 to 65 in the Valencian Community (VC), Spain, in anticipation of launching a population-based cervical screening program.MethodsA qualitative study was conducted using four face-to-face focus groups involving 29 women, selected from the target population of the screening programme (healthy women aged 35-65 residing in the VC). The session combined an individual assessment (questionnaire and electronic response system of five self-sampling devices) with a structured group discussion. Preferences regarding invitation channels, test communication, and device usability were analyzed through descriptive statistics and thematic content analysis.ResultsSelf-sampling was highly accepted, with 96.4% of women stating they would perform it at home. Preferred channels for both invitations and results were SMS and local health centers. Simplicity and ease of use were the key features of the device accepted by the largest number of women-FLOQSwab. Evalyn Brush was also positively valued for its attractive design and was the preferred option for some women. Participants expressed concerns about reliability and proper use, particularly among older women or those with limited body awareness. Familiarity with colorectal screening supported acceptance. Importantly, device selection emerged as a key factor in facilitating participation. The integration of digital technologies (SMS, health apps) was positively valued as a means of increasing accessibility, improving communication, and supporting equity in outreach efforts.ConclusionSelf-sampling is a feasible and widely accepted strategy for cervical cancer screening. Effective implementation requires validated devices, culturally adapted information campaigns, and digital engagement tools to maximize participation and reduce inequalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.